Clinical & commercial position · Newport News
Why we don’t sell retail skincare.
Most medspas sell skincare. We don’t, deliberately. Almost every “medical-grade” or “physician-dispensed” product contains the same active ingredients at comparable concentrations as products from CeraVe, La Roche-Posay, The Ordinary, Maelove, and similar brands — at one-quarter to one-sixth the price. The premium reflects distribution and branding, not chemistry.
The category doesn’t have the regulatory backing its name implies
“Medical-grade skincare” sounds like an FDA classification. It isn’t. The FDA regulates cosmetics and drugs; there is no third tier called “medical grade.” The phrase has no legal definition, no concentration minimum, no efficacy requirement, and no manufacturing standard that distinguishes it from any other cosmetic.
What the term does describe, accurately, is a distribution channel — products sold through medical offices rather than retail stores. That’s a commercial category, not a clinical one. Real exceptions exist (prescription products, OTC drug monographs like sunscreens, stricter cGMP manufacturing) — but those aren’t unique to the medspa channel. CeraVe sunscreen is under an OTC drug monograph too.
The economics of why everyone else sells it
It’s worth being honest about the structural reason most medspas carry retail. Wholesale costs on physician-dispensed brands typically run 40–55% of suggested retail; practices sell at or near full price; the product is consumable; and it attaches naturally to the appointment moment. Industry sources put retail revenue at $400–$800 per active patient per year.
At our projected scale, that’s $60,000–$150,000 a year of revenue we’re choosing to forgo. We understand exactly what we’re walking away from. We walk away because every dollar of it depends on a recommendation we don’t think is clinically defensible. The reason every practice carries retail isn’t that the products are uniquely good — it’s that they’re uniquely good for the practice’s revenue.
The chemistry — same actives, different bottle
Higher concentrations. Most “medical-grade” vitamin C serums are 10–20% L-ascorbic acid; so are several OTC products. Niacinamide at 5–10%, retinol up to 1%, hyaluronic acid — all available OTC. The concentration premium usually isn’t there.
Better formulation. This is the category’s strongest argument and deserves a fair hearing — vehicle, pH, stabilizers, and antioxidant pairings do matter. Some “medical-grade” products are genuinely better formulated than the median OTC equivalent. But many drugstore brands now match or exceed them, the difference is rarely large enough to justify a 4×–6× premium, and independent comparative testing usually fails to show meaningful clinical differences.
Better penetration. Mostly false. Penetration is governed by molecular weight, lipophilicity, pH, and the skin barrier — not branding. There is no in-office magic that drugstore products don’t have access to.
The case study: SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic
The cleanest single illustration is the most famous product in the category. SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic — 15% L-ascorbic acid + 1% vitamin E + 0.5% ferulic acid, at a low pH, in a specific vehicle — was developed at Duke University and protected by U.S. patent. For years it was the gold-standard daytime antioxidant serum, and it earned that reputation honestly. The formula works.
That patent protection has since lapsed. Multiple brands now make the same architecture — same actives, same concentrations, same pH range — at a fraction of the price:
| Product | Active formula | Concentration | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkinCeuticals C E Ferulic | L-AA + vitamin E + ferulic | 15% / 1% / 0.5% | ~$182 |
| Maelove Glow Maker | L-AA + vitamin E + ferulic | 15% / 1% / 0.5% | ~$30 |
| Timeless 20% C+E+Ferulic | L-AA + vitamin E + ferulic | 20% / 1% / 0.5% | ~$30 |
Pour all three into unmarked dropper bottles and ask a patient — or most clinicians — to identify the SkinCeuticals one by feel, color, scent, or in-clinic performance, and almost no one could. Same actives, same concentrations, same formula architecture, same pH, roughly $150 of price delta. That isn’t a chemistry difference; it’s a distribution and branding difference. The formula isn’t bad — we’re telling you what you’re actually paying for: the brand, the bottle, the channel. Not the molecule.
Over a decade, the difference is roughly $4,500–$6,000 — redirected from a bottle to literally anything else.
We chose this comparison because it’s the cleanest publicly verifiable one. Comparable analyses hold for most “medical-grade” vitamin C, retinol, peptide, niacinamide, and hyaluronic acid products. We don’t sell any of them. We won’t.
The exceptions — what genuinely requires a medical channel
A fair page has to say what’s not equivalent. Our position on retail does not apply to genuine prescriptions, which we write when they’re the right call — they go through a pharmacy, and we don’t mark them up:
- Prescription tretinoin — the gold-standard topical anti-aging molecule, meaningfully stronger than OTC retinol. A $20/month prescription often outperforms a $400/month OTC routine.
- Prescription hydroquinone for hyperpigmentation and melasma — no OTC equivalent at this strength.
- Compounded topicals for select indications, from a real compounding pharmacy.
- Topical antibiotic and Rx-strength benzoyl peroxide combinations for inflammatory acne.
- Prescription-strength azelaic acid for resistant melasma or rosacea.
In each case, what you’re paying for is the prescription and the clinical judgment to use it — a service, not a branded bottle on our shelf.
What about aftercare for in-office procedures?
After certain procedures — ablative laser resurfacing, microneedling, deeper treatments — you genuinely need specific products for the healing window: a gentle cleanser, an occlusive ointment, a mineral sunscreen. We include those in a small aftercare kit, built into the procedure price. It’s procedure support, not retail. You will not be sold $300 of “recovery” products on your way out the door.
Common objections
“But I’ve used [brand] for years and it works.” Several “medical-grade” brands make good products — we’re not saying they don’t work. We’re saying you’re paying a premium the chemistry doesn’t justify. Keep using it if you like; we’ll write your routine around it. The next bottle can be the $30 version without sacrificing anything that matters clinically.
“Isn’t there a quality-control difference?” Not in any way the FDA recognizes. cGMP standards apply to the large OTC manufacturers too — some of the most rigorously regulated cosmetic makers in the world.
“My provider recommended this.” Most providers recommend in good faith — the products work and they’ve seen results. Our point is structural: the price reflects channel, not chemistry, and we’d rather not participate in a markup we don’t think is defensible. That’s a difference of position, not a criticism.
“Isn’t buying from Amazon risky?” Counterfeits are a real problem for high-margin luxury skincare. The drugstore-tier products we recommend are far less commonly counterfeited because the margins don’t reward it. Buy from the manufacturer’s site or a major retailer to be safe.
What we do instead
- At your consult, we write you a routine — specific products by name and brand, with prices and where to buy them.
- We publish those recommendations on our Skincare We Actually Recommend page, updated quarterly, with no affiliate links and no manufacturer relationships.
- We dispense prescriptions when prescriptions are the answer — to a real pharmacy, not our shelf.
- We include aftercare in the procedure price — what you need to heal, nothing more.
The honest summary
We don’t sell retail skincare because we couldn’t make the recommendation honestly and look the patient in the eye. The products work, but the markup reflects distribution and branding, not chemistry, and the same actives are available at one-quarter to one-sixth the price elsewhere. We charge a fair price for the procedures we perform, we write your routine and tell you where to buy what’s in it, and we forgo the retail revenue line nearly every other practice carries — deliberately, with full awareness of the dollars involved.
Last reviewed June 2026. We update this page when new information materially changes our position. The product comparisons here are publicly verifiable; prices are approximate and validated at each update.
Brand names referenced are the trademarks of their respective owners and are used for identification and comparison only.
Founding patients · Opening Fall 2026
A routine written for your skin — nothing sold from a shelf.
At your consult you’ll leave with a written routine and zero pressure to buy anything from us. Founding patients receive 15% off all services through December 31, 2026.
Join the Founding List